• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Fifty by Fifty

A MOVEMENT FOR EMPLOYEE OWNERSHIP

  • About us
  • Employee Ownership News
  • Our publications
  • Resource center
  • Connect
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Michael Palmieri and Chris Cooper Respond: What Are We Asking of Employee Ownership?

karenkahn33@outlook.com · Dec 24, 2019 ·

The news that New Belgium Brewery and its worker-owners decided to sell to Kirin Holdings took everyone by surprise, except maybe those responsible for running (and growing) the business. Interpretations of the employee-approved sale varied — some saw it as a sign of the limits of the ESOP model of employee ownership, while others viewed it as a success story that kept the business open while generating what is essentially a significant transfer of wealth to all employee participants. 

It is worthwhile to think further on how we go about analyzing the sale of employee-owned firms, as clearly New Belgium will not be the last such sale. To do so, we will set aside the question of which of the many models best represents the concept of “employee ownership” to ask a different but no less fundamental question: what is the purpose of employee ownership? Or better yet, what are we asking employee ownership to do?

These questions inevitably lead us to another question, whether employee ownership is a means to an end, or an end in and of itself — though it’s clearly both. Very generally speaking, ESOPs tend to do a better job at generating wealth for employee participants, while worker cooperatives tend to do a better job with worker involvement, participation, and democratic control of the business. Which is more important? 

This isn’t a gotcha question — nor is it a simple one with simple answers.  An ESOP is a qualified pension plan that is designed to help workers generate additional wealth for their retirement. Cooperatives are mutual enterprises designed to correct specific market dislocations, whether they be with the supply of agricultural products, or with employment opportunities in various communities. Yet we often ask both to solve fundamental economic and political issues that they may not be designed to fix.

How one interprets the sale of New Belgium then depends on how one answers the ends vs. means question. If the goal is building a new ownership economy that transforms large scale societal and economic relationships, perhaps the sale of New Belgium can be classified as a noble failure. If building (and transferring) wealth for workers is the goal, then perhaps the sale can be considered a success. But we should make clear that judging something as a success or failure is a deeper question, which cannot be answered by merely weighing six-figure payouts against a sale to a multi-national conglomerate. Doing so can miss the complex ways that wealth inequalities are generated and maintained and how the employee-ownership model, even after it ends, provides a bulwark against wealth concentration.

Very generally speaking, ESOPs tend to do a better job at generating wealth for employee participants, while worker cooperatives tend to do a better job with worker involvement, participation, and democratic control of the business. Which is more important? 

As research from the Rutgers Institute for the Study of Employee Ownership and Profit Sharing makes clear, wealth is composed of more than financial assets. It includes financial literacy; leadership skills; education and expanded workforce capabilities; social networks; and the opportunity to pass along these assets through inter-generational transfers. What will come of the financial wealth worker-owners have built for themselves? Perhaps it will be used for tuition for a college education for a first-generation student; purchasing a new home for a first-generation homeowner; starting a new, and maybe employee-owned, business; or providing for a dignified retirement for working people. We all agree New Belgium was a transformative company — but we should also recognize that the transformational impact likely hasn’t ended.

While the ESOP accounts at New Belgium will close, the numerous assets and experiences the employee owners have built up, and the future opportunities made possible, will not. The experience will have positive repercussions that will reverberate through the lives of employees, their families, and their communities in ways hard to calculate here today. And when we judge, from the outside, whether the sale rates as a success or a failure, we might do well to remember the informal motto of the Mondragon cooperators as they navigate their employee ownership experience: “This is not heaven and we are not angels.”

Michael Palmieri is a student at Kent State’s PhD program in political science and a research assistant at the OEOC. His research focuses on worker ownership, broadly defined, and how it can be used as a local economic development strategy.

Chris Cooper is a program coordinator at the Ohio Employee Ownership Center (OEOC) at Kent State University, where he has been promoting employee ownership for 20-plus years.

John McNamara Responds: New Belgium Brewery Goes Flat

Hazel Corcoran: What If We Had an Antidote to Worker Co-ops Selling Out?

Christopher Mackin: New Belgium Brewing and the Future of American ESOPs

Camille Kerr Responds: Don’t lose sight—the point is systems change

Karen Kahn: Is Your Beer Funding Human Rights Abuses?

Christopher Michael: Could the Employee Ownership Trust Better Sustain Perpetual Employee Ownership?

Last call: A forum on the end of employee ownership at New Belgium

Nathan Schneider: Discarded Mutualisms

Martin Staubus: New Belgium—A Success by Any Measure

Melissa Hoover: Employee Ownership Often Helps to Shape and Build Hot New Markets—Then What?

Erbin Crowell and Sonja Novkovic: ESOPs or Co-ops? Depends on the Long-Term Goal

Jennifer Briggs: New Belgium Was More than an ESOP

Jared Kaplan: The Sustainable Legacy of New Belgium Brewing

Jason Wiener: Let’s Not Let the Ideal Be the Enemy of the Pretty-Darn-Great

Matt Cropp: What is Expected of Employee Ownership?

Dave Hammer: Employee Ownership Must Become a Movement for Social Change

Bret Keisling: New Belgium—A great story to tell

Daniel Fireside: How Beeswax and Rope Can Save Your Company’s Soul

Michael Keeling: ESOP Terminations—Red Flag?

Joseph Blasi: New Belgium—A Victim of Its Own Success

Corey Rosen: ESOP companies face the same pressures and opportunities all companies do

Last Call: A forum on the end of employee ownership at New Belgium

A project of:

Democracy Collaborative

Copyright © 2023 · Monochrome Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

  • About Fifty by Fifty
  • Employee ownership news